The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant has no motiveed the victim;

Since witnesses were the officers of senior citizens society, such as victims, at a location far away from the defendant at the time, they could not hear the meaning of the defendant. The witness’s statement that the witness was able to take care of the witness at the place of this case because he was not good, or the witness was not at the place of the same representative election. Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts, even though the witness’s statement was not credibility.

2. The Defendant has the same assertion as the Defendant alleged in the lower court.

The court below rejected the assertion on the argument following the summary of the evidence.

In the judgment of the court below, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the defendant: (a) visited the senior citizen party to ask questions about the reason why he is responsible for a witness for the election of the representative of the occupants at the senior citizen council; and (b) stated that “the victim was able to ask questions about the reason why he is responsible for a witness for the election of the representative of the occupants at the senior citizen council; and (c) he left his own clothes; and (d) the defendant’s above argument that he sent the victim to the defendant without any particular reason is difficult to obtain; (b) the defendant was in the senior citizen center and in the local election, and (c) the defendant was in the senior citizen center and in the center for senior citizens, “whether the senior candidate was in contact with the senior director’s meeting” (the investigation record 21, 22 pages); and (d) whether he lends the senior candidate as his authority.

6. 13. 13. Whether or not to lend a polling station to a local election (the 71th page of the trial record) is consistent with the statements of the victim and witnesses who expressed their desire to do so to the victim for reasons, such as whether or not they are lent to a polling station (the 71st page of the trial record), and the victim reported to an investigative agency on the date of the occurrence of the instant case and filed a complaint with the defendant.