1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

2017 Highest 5917

1. From September 25, 2017, the Defendant attempted to larceny: (a) around September 22:18, 2017; (b) around the E convenience store run by the victim D located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant did not commit an attempted larceny with one table, one chair, and one chair, which was installed front of the E convenience store run by the victim D; and (c) the Defendant did not commit an attempted theft with the victim’s control that was discovered.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim by hand on the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph 1, on the ground that the said victim sawd himself as the tables and her.

At around 2018, Defendant 1872, on March 30, 2018, Defendant 1 expressed a bath to “I spath, spath, spatha, spatha, spatha, spatha, spatha, spatha, spathn, spathn, etc.” when I asked her to return home upon receiving 112 reports from G Spast in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu. Defendant 2 committed assault, such as spathing down the face of the above I, spathing, and spathing the head.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

2017 Highest 5917

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Photographss of damaged articles 2018 Bano 1872;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act (Attempted thief, Selection of Imprisonment) concerning criminal facts (Assaults, Selection of Imprisonment, and Selection of Imprisonment) Article 260(1) of the o Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of public duties, Selection of Imprisonment, and Selection of Imprisonment) Article 136(1) of the o Criminal Act

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act)

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 186 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the burden of litigation costs, is seven times the criminal defendant's violent and larceny criminal records.

In addition, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is serious, and this seems to have caused a large desire for enforcement officers in control.

However, the fact that the defendant is against the crime during his/her detention.