The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (in 10 months of imprisonment, forfeiture of No. 1 of seized evidence, additional collection of KRW 200,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected, and that there is no record of punishment for the same crime, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is an act of arranging sexual traffic to a female living together with a intellectual disability, and the nature of the crime is not very good, and the defendant has been punished several times due to his previous convictions such as theft and fraud, and the defendant commits the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of two years on September 6, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on August, 2016 due to interference with the execution of official duties, and the judgment became final and conclusive during the period of suspension of execution.

In this case where there is no change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below since the above circumstances occurred in the appellate trial, considering the conditions of all the sentencing as shown in the record and the changed theory, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable and goes beyond the scope of reasonable discretion.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.