Text
1. Within 3 days from the date this ruling became final,
A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. on the initial screen of L’s website.
Reasons
1. On July 2015, the Plaintiff was the professor of U.S. Armed Forces and the Director, around July 2015, and Defendant K operated an online newspaper company called “W”. The remainder of the Defendants are media companies aimed at broadcasting business, newspaper publishing business, etc.
Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “B”), C (hereinafter referred to as “C”), D (hereinafter referred to as “E”), E (hereinafter referred to as “E”), F (hereinafter referred to as “H”), H Limited Liability Company, I (hereinafter referred to as “H”), J (hereinafter referred to as “J”), and K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”), on June 11, 2017, and Defendant G Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “G”) included each article of the Plaintiff’s order on June 12, 2017, as indicated in [Attachment 3] List 1 through 9 (hereinafter referred to as “I”), and included the Plaintiff’s order on behalf of the Plaintiff in the instant case (hereinafter referred to as “YY”) to be referred to as “YY-E-E-E-E-E-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-Y”).
Meanwhile, the Z Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Z”) shall commit a sex offense against the Plaintiff’s YY around 5:47 a.m. on June 11, 2017 prior to reporting each of the instant articles.