logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.23 2016노4180
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강제추행)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On August 25, 2016, the lower court found the victim D guilty of the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (voluntary indecent act by blood) against the victims in the part of the case of the defendant, and found the victim D guilty of the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (voluntary indecent act by blood) against the victim D, and the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against the victim C (voluntary indecent act by blood) with respect to each sexual crime on or before July 2016, and acquitted the victim D of the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (voluntary indecent act by blood) on August 23, 2016 and on August 24, 2016, and sentenced the prosecutor to the punishment of the sexual crime and the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Relatives by blood with respect to the victim D contained in this part of the charges.

Defendant

Only the part of the defendant's conviction which the prosecutor did not appeal against the guilty portion of the defendant's case, is exempted from the object of the attack and defense between the parties, but is in fact relieved from the object of the attack and defense, so this part of the judgment of the court below shall be subject to the conclusion of the judgment of the court below, and shall not be judged again at the court below, notwithstanding Articles 21-8 and 9 (8) of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders and the Electronic Monitoring, Etc., the scope of the judgment of the court below shall be excluded from the part of the defendant's case, because there is no benefit of appeal against the part of the attachment order and the order to observe the attachment order, the part of the case shall be subject to the provisions of Articles 21-8 and 9 (8) of the Act on the Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Electronic Devices. Thus, the scope of the judgment of the court below of this case shall be the defendant's violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against the victims who were convicted by the court below.

arrow