Text
1. The Defendant’s expulsion against the Plaintiff on August 30, 2013 confirms that its expulsion disposition is null and void.
2. The plaintiff's remainder.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Intervenor joining the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Plaintiff’s writing contract between the Intervenor and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) are corporations with the objective of film investment and import distribution, video and broadcast materials production, and sound record planning.
An intervenor was requested by C to produce the drama (hereinafter “the drama in this case”) in which the cartoon written by D (hereinafter “original cartoon”) was the original work by C.
On November 18, 2011, the intervenor entered into a contract with B for the writing and use of a broadcast theater with the instant drama.
B written and delivered to intervenors the original copy of the Siopticon (hereinafter referred to as the “Prior Eopticon”) and the main copy from one to eight parts (hereinafter referred to as the “Prior Copy of this case”). In addition, the previous Siopticon and the main part of the previous Siopon (hereinafter referred to as the “Prior Works”) were written and delivered to intervenors.
However, the intervenor rescinded the above contract with B around October 2012 on the ground that it is difficult to broadcast the film after the completion of the main text.
B. The Intervenor and the Plaintiff’s writing contract rescinded the writing contract with B, and entered into a contract with the Plaintiff for the writing and use of the broadcast theater to the instant drama.
From January 2013 to April 201 of the same year, the Plaintiff written and delivered to the intervenors theonoptic book of the instant drama (hereinafter referred to as the “onoptic book of this case”) and the script (hereinafter referred to as the “the instant script”). In addition, the Plaintiff written and delivered the instant copyrighted work to the intervenors.
The Intervenor produced the instant drama on the basis of the instant copyrighted work.
C. The defendant's expulsion measures is an incorporated association established to protect the rights and interests of broadcasting writers, including their copyright, and to improve and develop the literature of broadcasting, and the plaintiff is a member of the defendant.
On February 6, 2013, the Defendant received from B the petition that the instant copyrighted work infringed B’s copyright of the prior copyrighted work.
The defendant shall be the defendant.