logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.06.07 2014가합12372
물품대금 등
Text

1. Defendant C Co., Ltd.:

A. From January 1, 2014, the Plaintiff 70,394,500 won and its related thereto:

B. The plaintiff B.

Reasons

Basic Facts

From June 28, 2013 to December 30, 2013, Plaintiff C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) supplied Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) with fishery-related goods worth KRW 105,564,000.

After that, Defendant C paid the Plaintiff KRW 35,170,000,000 to the Plaintiff on June 28, 2013, KRW 10 million on July 28, 2013, KRW 35,170,000 on November 18, 2013.

Plaintiff

B From April 19, 2013 to January 10, 2014, G and H (each of the vessels listed in the attached Table; hereinafter “each of the instant vessels”) owned by the Defendant C has been repaired, and the Defendant C repaid KRW 66,790,000 out of the repair cost of KRW 126,460,000 until January 10, 2014.

Defendant C, on April 4, 2014, concluded a sales contract with Defendant C for each of the instant vessels (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), and completed each registration of ownership transfer on April 11, 2014.

At the time of the instant sales contract to change the rights of each of the instant vessels, the fishery permission (the permission number: 1. The two-boat large bottom fishing l. the permission period: the Incheon Metropolitan City double bottom fishing l. the permission period: December 31, 2017; hereinafter referred to as “instant fishery permission”) was granted in the name of Defendant C with respect to each of the instant vessels at the time of the instant sales contract.

Defendant D concluded a sales contract with Defendant E for each of the instant vessels on May 23, 2014, and completed each registration of ownership transfer on May 26, 2014.

Defendant E entered into a sales contract with Defendant F with respect to each of the instant vessels on June 23, 2014, and completed the registration of each of the instant vessels on June 25, 2014.

【Defendant C’s ground for recognition: According to the facts that there is no dispute over Defendant D, E, and F, Gap’s evidence No. 1 through 6, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1 (including serial numbers), and the facts that are based on the overall purport of the pleadings as to the claim against Defendant C, the defendant C’s remainder of the price of the goods to the plaintiff A = 205,564,00 won = 205,564,00 won- 35,170.

arrow