logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.08.11 2017고단732
특수절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual special larceny at the Jeonju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jeonju prison on March 26, 2017.

[2] On June 8, 2017, at around 03:18, the Defendant: (a) 40,000 won in cash, which is owned by the victim E, from the wall located above the seat of the carper, after melting the fixed device of the crime prevention window installed in the place before the window of the "D" food store in the Gunsan-si, Sinsan-si; (b) removing the fixed device of the crime prevention window installed in the place; (c) removing the window of the crime prevention window; and (d) intrusion into the restaurant through the unrecepted window; and (d) taking

In addition, from May 28, 2017 to June 16, 2017, the victims’ property was stolen or attempted to steals 14 times in total, such as the list in the annexed crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each statement in E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M,O, P, P, and Q;

1. On-site verification photographs and CCTV photographs;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (referring to the text of a judgment and search of prisoners);

1. Articles 331(1), 330 (the occupation of larceny at night), 342, 331(1) (the occupation of attempted special larceny), 342, and 330 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] / [the scope of punishment / [the scope of recommendation] for general property, which is likely to repeatedly criticize the crime by the same method during the period of repeated crime, as the same method during the period of repeated crime.

However, in full view of the fact that the defendant has yet to be aged and has no significant damage, it is within the scope of the recommended punishment.

arrow