Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Seo-Support of the Daegu District Court on April 7, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escapeing vehicle) in the same court on April 7, 201, and was sentenced to six months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the sex support of the Daegu District Court on February 14, 2013, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (toxicly Driving) and a violation of the Guarantee of Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages at the same court on November 27, 2014, and was sentenced to one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act ( Drinking), and on October 27, 2015, the records of punishment for driving under drinking two or more times such as the termination of the execution of the sentence.
[Criminal facts] On December 6, 2016, the Defendant driven B-blades car that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the roads near Haho-ri, Hawa, U.S. under the influence of alcohol content 0.165% in blood around 00:40 on December 6, 2016.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver at the main place, and statement of alcohol alcohol during blood;
1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;
1. Criminal records as stated: Application of inquiry letter, investigation report (Attachment to the judgement) and other Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal history;
1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking and the choice of imprisonment), Article 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (the point of operating cars which are not mandatory insurance and the choice of imprisonment);
1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;
1. The crime of this case is very poor in the sense that the defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Code aggravated concurrent crimes, drives a motor vehicle in which he/she failed to purchase mandatory insurance even under drinking even though he/she was under repeated crimes due to the same kind of crime, and pays the traffic accident, and thus, the sentence of sentence against the defendant is inevitable.
However, the fact that the defendant recognizes his mistake and reflects it, and other defendant's person.