logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.03.27 2018가단9609
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's case against the plaintiff of Suwon District Court of April 14, 2009 for the price of goods 2009 tea275.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 19, 2004, Defendant (Co., Ltd. at the time of the contract) entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to supply three children (D, E, and F) learning sites of the Plaintiff.

The defendant paid the subscription fees of KRW 45,00 (11,250 x 4) per week to D, with the subscription fees of KRW 11,250 per week set as KRW 12 months (48 weeks) for E and F respectively, respectively, and the plaintiff paid the subscription fees of KRW 45,00 (11,250 x 4) on the 20th of each month.

B. From April 27, 2004 to July 18, 2006, the Defendant supplied D with a total of 811,250 won (11,250 won x 81 times, and not supplied for each share) for 72 minutes until March 2006, and supplied the remainder of 9 minutes after May 2006.

The defendant supplied 540,000 won (11,250 won x 48 times) in total from April 27, 2004 to May 31, 2005, respectively, to E and F.

The plaintiff paid KRW 20,000 upon entering into a contract, and paid KRW 250,000 on June 11, 2004.

C. On April 3, 2009, the Defendant applied for a payment order against the Plaintiff on April 19, 2009, stating that “The Defendant shall pay KRW 2,160,000 per annum to the Plaintiff on April 19, 2004 and KRW 90,000 per annum on April 20 of the month following the delivery of the original payment order,” and the Defendant supplied the learning site by 2,750,970 won until the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th month, but did not pay the remainder of KRW 1,750,970 by paying KRW 27 million.” The Plaintiff on April 14, 2009 and the payment order was issued to the Defendant at the rate of KRW 20% per annum from the day following the delivery of the original payment order until the day of the original payment order.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 and 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion pays 270,000 won to the plaintiff at the request of the defendant around 2005 and concludes a contract for the place of learning.

arrow