1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Intervenor is a public institution established by C law, and approximately 13,660 full-time workers are employed and engages in the business of managing insurance benefits.

On December 10, 1991, the Plaintiff joined the Intervenor, and was promoted to Grade IV (director) on July 1, 2007. From March 18, 2013, the Plaintiff served in the dispatching branch office of the Intervenor.

B. On July 10, 2017, D joined the Intervenor’s branch office as an intern.

On July 13, 2017, the Plaintiff proposed that D be able to get on the back of the taxi by making it known that D will be able to get on the back of the taxi, followed by inserting her hand into D’s stack, which was under the influence of alcohol, and changed D’s chest by inserting her hand into D’s kis, which was under the influence of alcohol, and re-putting her hand into D’s part.

(hereinafter referred to as "first misconduct"). (c)

The Plaintiff, around 22:57 on the same day, arrived at the residence of D, followed the floor where D was living, following the Plaintiff’s words “I return to the home”, even though having arrived at D.

D In order for d to open the door to his dwelling place, the defective plaintiff sent the door to the door so that D cannot open the door.

(hereinafter referred to as "second misconduct") d.

On July 18, 2017, the Plaintiff proposed that the Plaintiff drinkd D while drinking alcohol, located far away from the Plaintiff, and, after the end of the meeting, moved female employees to a Kafin located adjacent to the Kafa, proposed that the Plaintiff start into the Kafa and drinkd D's arms and drinkd D's arms.

(hereinafter referred to as "third misconduct"). E.

On July 20, 2017, the Plaintiff instructed D, on July 25, 2017, D to make it available for internship members to attend a trade union meeting held on the 25th of the same month.

D In order to make a public announcement according to the direction of the plaintiff, the plaintiff who takes out the mobile phone was aware of D's telephone number by putting D's mobile phone into his own mobile phone.

hereinafter “fourth misconduct”.