logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.03 2014고합575
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(허위세금계산서교부등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years and by a fine not exceeding seven hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a representative in the name of establishing “E” within the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City “D”, and F is a person who actually operates D.

The Defendant, while working as D’s employee, continued to increase the sales revenue of D, but failed to receive purchase deduction due to the lack of data for purchase, established E in collusion with F in the name of the Defendant in collusion with F, and attempted to submit a false list of sales and purchase tax invoices as if the purchase, sales and purchase were E, and sales were E.

1. No person to be submitted by buyer by buyer shall supply goods or services for profit, and submit to the Government the list of the total tax invoice by buyer under the Value-Added Tax Act by false entry;

Nevertheless, on October 23, 2009, the Defendant conspired with F and submitted to the public official in charge of the said tax office a false entry of the total supply price of KRW 5,022,389,69,695 in total seven times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table (1) from October 23, 2009, when the Defendant filed a preliminary return of value-added tax return for the second half of 2009, E-209, although there was no fact that the scrap metal, etc. was supplied to two enterprises, such as G, etc., in the absence of supply of scrap metal, etc., to G, etc., and submitted to the public official in charge of the said tax office by stating the false entry of the total supply price of KRW 5,429,00 in total in the list of crimes (1).

2. No person who submits a list of total tax invoices by customer shall submit to the Government the list of total tax invoices by customer under the Value-Added Tax Act after entering the false list of total tax invoices by customer.

Nevertheless, in collusion with F on January 25, 2010, the Defendant filed the final return of value-added tax for the second year of 2009 by E in collusion with F, and the fact is scraped from 12 companies, such as H, etc.

arrow