logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.10.17 2018고단2280
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding 600,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant obstructed business from around 03:50 on June 6, 2018 to 04:03 on the same day, the Defendant was unable to avoid any disturbance, such as making the victim’s “E” under the influence of alcohol at the “E” telecom, which is operated by the victim D in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, as an employee, without any particular reason.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victimized person by force between approximately 13 minutes.

2. The Defendant, at around 04:05 on the same day as the foregoing paragraph (1) above, has a person who spawns alcohol in the same place as the foregoing paragraph (1).

“A police officer dispatched to the F District of the F District of Ulsan-gu Police Station G belonging to the F District of the F District of the F District of the Republic of Ulsan-do, who was reported to the scene, and even though there are citizens, “A bit of a bit of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch, D

The year of birth shall be raised.

In the absence of, the year in which she entered the lux and raises the luxal disease refers to the 1st head.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

3. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, as in paragraph 1 of the above provision, was arrested from police officers belonging to the Ulsan Central Police Station F District Police Station in the Ulsan Central Police Station, who were dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports, and was accompanied by the F District in the Ulsan Central Police Agency H in the Ulsan Central District.

From 04:10 on the same day to 04:30 on the same day, Defendant 1 expressed a great voice to police officers at the same place under the influence of alcohol, “Abre h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to very rough words and actions by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the petition of G production;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314(1) of the choice of punishment (the point of interference with business);

arrow