A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 31, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) searched and printed out the form of a certificate of employment on the Internet for the purpose of using it in the Defendant’s residence located in Seocho-si B; and (b) affixed a corporate seal on the part of the Defendant stating “A”, “C”, “C”, “E”, “E”, and “B” in the name of the employer’s company in the column of the name of the employer; and (c) affixed a corporate seal on the part of “D E”, “B”, and “I verify that he is in office at the workplace from January 4, 2015 to August 31, 2015.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a certificate of employment in the name of (State)D.

2. Around September 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) submitted a forged certificate of employment as referred to in the preceding paragraph at the Sungsan post office located in the Sungsan-Eup, Seopo-si, Seopo-si; and (b) submitted it as if he were genuinely prepared to the employees of the Gampo Savings Bank who knew of the fact.

3. On September 3, 2015, the Defendant applied for a loan of KRW 8 million and KRW 8,400,000 for a general loan to the Bank of Solarg Savings Co., Ltd. from the Sungsan-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si. The Defendant submitted to the victim a forged employment certificate as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

However, the fact was that the defendant, even though he did not hold office in the state(D) at the time, submitted a false certificate of employment, and there was no intention or ability to repay even if he received a loan from the victim due to the lack of certain property or income.

On September 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) transferred KRW 8 million from the victim as a general loan; and (c) received KRW 8.4 million under the name of the large patient loan; and (d) acquired KRW 16.4 million in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police in relation to G.