Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is a person who worked as the representative director of (ju) F of the machinery and equipment manufacturing chain from March 2013 to March 2015, and Defendant B is a person who worked as the representative director of (ju)G from January 2013 to December 2013.

(State)F is an enterprise that uses a company's exclusive purchase card through a contract with the National Bank of Korea with the injured party, and (State)G is an enterprise that enters into a contract with the injured party as an enterprise purchase card merchant. Thus, if the two enterprises purchase goods from the State (State) F.G. to pay the proceeds with the enterprise purchase exclusive purchase card, they can transmit the supplied details to the injured party and receive preferential payment from the injured party, and thereafter, they could make external sales transactions in the form of paying the proceeds to the injured party on the designated settlement date.

Defendant

A On October 2013, when the operating funds of the Fman (State) were insufficient, A abused the above points, and made payments to Defendant B by using a company-only card as if he received from (State) F’s (State), and paid the personnel expenses, and (State) G made a request for financing by receiving the amount equivalent to the personnel expenses from the injured party and sending it to (State) F. Defendant B received the request from Defendant A who was in the ordinary transactional relationship.

On October 4, 2013, Defendant A had access to the victim’s Internet banking site using a computer at the (State) F Office located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S., and paid KRW 100 million to the company’s exclusive purchase card by pretending that Defendant A supplied the victim’s Internet banking site, and on the same day, Defendant B claimed payment of the amount equivalent to the sales bond to the effect that the victim had such transaction.

However, in fact, the defendants are only for the purpose of financing the operating funds of (State)F by pretending to false sales (State) and (State)G actually to F.