logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.30 2016고단1009
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 2010 to 2010, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 1009,” was a person who had a credit card store with 1 to 50,000 people, and became aware of C’s sexual intercourse victim D through C, the customer, and the victim F victim D (n, 27 years old) and the victim F (n, 51 years old) who was the mother of the victim E through the victim D, became aware of the name of Dong.

1. On July 8, 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim D would pay the victim D 50 days after lending money to the victim D at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in the Suwon-si Transferdong on July 8, 2014.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, while the Defendant did not have any particular property or income at the time, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan even if he borrowed money from the injured party with the liability of KRW 15 million.

As above, the Defendant, as well as by deceiving the victim, received 244,000 won from the victim to the Defendant’s national bank account on the same day from the victim, and subsequently acquired 31,865,000 won in total from the damaged person on nine occasions from the victim, such as the last day of the annexed crime list (1) from December 12, 2014.

2. On July 23, 2014, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim F and E: (a) at the Victim F’s house located in G in G in Sungsung-si around July 23, 2014, the Victim F and the Defendant would have to offer money to the Victim “on the terms of good faith,” and would have to pay money seven (7) days after lending money.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the Defendant did not have the ability to sell money on good condition, the Defendant did not have any particular property or income at the time, while the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, which would amount to 15 million won.

As above, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) transferred KRW 1,040,400 to the Defendant’s national bank account on the same day from the victim; and (c) from that time until October 20, 2014, from that time, the Defendant re-written list of crimes (2).

arrow