logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.07.10 2018고합88
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In October 2017, the Defendant received money from the victim C, who was in the middle of October, 2017, from the victim C, under the pretext of having been detained in the Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office for the violation of the National Sports Promotion Act and being investigated by the Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office for the purpose of release. The Defendant received money from the victim under the pretext of having the need to pay money to investigation agencies or courts.

1. On October 13, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime (Fraud) around October 13, 2017: (a) within the double store operated by the victim of Busan Jin-gu E around October 13, 2017, “A lawyer has been aware of the President who had been fry, who had been fry, was a lawyer; (b) KRW 1.5 million is needed to appoint a lawyer.

Although the Defendant made a false statement, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the said money to the head of the office for the appointment of a lawyer only when he/she wishes to use the said money for his/her personal purpose.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 1.5 million won in cash from the injured party.

2. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as that of paragraph 1, around October 16, 2017, set up a hearing device at an investigative agency at the victim’s residence, at the same time as that of paragraph (1).

A false statement was made to "the cost of KRW 2 million should be borne by all the goods in the apartment."

However, in fact, there was no proof that investigative agency had set up an order in the above residence, and the defendant was thought to have used both for personal use by receiving the above money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 2 million won in cash from the injured party.

3. On October 17, 2017, the Defendant, at the place prescribed in paragraph 1 around October 17, 2017, proposed the victim to have an investigator of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office meet meals and undergo an investigation as well as having an investigator of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office conduct an investigation.

Expenses for investigators are required.

“A false statement.”

arrow