The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the reasons for appeal is that the original court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment and fines for the same type of crime, such as in-take and in-depth without prison labor, and on June 27, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to one and a half years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on August 26, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was completed on August 26, 2013 and is still under repeated crime period for the same kind of crime, despite the fact that the defendant committed the instantless crime from September 13, 2013 to September 9, 2013 even after the release, and the defendant committed the instantless crime from September 13, 2013 and nine times at the same time. Considering that the total amount of damage caused by the instantless crime is less than 2.44,00 won when considering the nature of the crime, the defendant did not make any effort to recover from damage until the trial of the court, and that most victims were punished for the defendant, as well as the defendant's age-oriented circumstances.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.