logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.11 2017고단3127
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above sentence against Defendant G for a period of three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on March 19, 2015, he/she was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Daegu District Court for two years, and completed the execution of the sentence on March 23, 2016, and is not a narcotics handler.

On August 2016, the Defendants were blicked to the “J” telecom room located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and Defendant G asked Defendant A to have a Meblopic clopic clopic clopic clopic clopic clopic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic c

Summary of Evidence

1. On the first trial date of Defendant G, each legal statement of Defendant A at the second trial date;

1. Statement concerning the suspect examination protocol concerning Defendant G in the prosecution room;

1. The transmission of DNA identity confirmation data data data search results, inquiry results into convict DNA personal information, investigation reports (written requests for appraisal and responses to requests for appraisal), investigation reports (in the results of genetic appraisal), criminal investigation reports (in addition to cellular phone call details), each seizure protocol and list of seizures, criminal investigation reports (in relation to amendments to places of crime), telephone details, requests for appraisal and narcotic appraisal reports, investigation reports (in relation to the place of crime and the specific date and time of investigation), investigation reports (in addition to requests for appraisal and replys to requests for appraisal), photo of the scene of seizure, each description or image of each of the following:

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, personal inquiry, and application of each statute described in the judgment;

1. The Defendants: Article 60(1)2 of the Narcotics Control Act and Article 4(1)1 and subparagraph 3(b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.;

1. A aggravated defendant for a repeated crime: Article 35 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant G with suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following conditions of sentencing shall be considered as favorable for the reasons for sentencing);

1. Defendant G for the protection and observation: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Additional collection Defendants: Grounds for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act

1. Defendant G (legal.)

arrow