A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the occupation of D, a coffee specialty in Daegu Dong-gu C building, A-102.

On May 27, 2016, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim E to acquire the said D shop on the condition of KRW 50,000,000 and KRW 95,000,000,000,000,000, whichever is later, by taking over the Defendant’s debt 25,000,00 won, in lieu of the Defendant’s debt 25,00,000,000 won, when transferring the said D shop. Thus, despite the fact that the Defendant sold the said D shop by appropriating false sales to increase the sales amount, the Defendant transferred the said D shop to the victim E, the Defendant agreed to acquire the said store on the condition of KRW 5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 won, in lieu of the Defendant’s debt 25,00,00 won.

On June 27, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 70 million from the Korean bank located in the same-sex-gu, Jung-gu, Daegu from the victim and acquired it through deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A contract for the transfer of rights, recording, evidentiary materials (current status of monthly sales), the current status of registration of false sales on June 2016, and the current status of sales on June 2016 (one-month share);

1. On June 3, 200, the CCTV files, CCTV files, and all data on the contract (19:20 seconds on May 24) / [the Defendant and the defense counsel, and the defense counsel, entered the sales in a false manner from June 2016, after entering into the contract, as the acquisition of the data on D (hereinafter “instant store”) was also asserted to the effect that the said acquisition did not constitute deception at the time of the contract.

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the records duly adopted and examined by this Court: ① Defendant 1.