logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.09 2014가합57599
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A, B, and E are jointly and severally and severally with F and G 296,332,622 won and 94,43,415 won among them.

Reasons

1. In order to suspend the extinctive prescription of “a loan granted to Defendant A, B, E, and network H by a future credit safe company on November 16, 2005,” and “a claim against Defendant C, a heir of Defendant A, B, E, and deceased H (Death, October 8, 2012) for the purpose of interruption of the extinctive prescription of “a loan granted to Defendant A, B, E, and network H by Busan District Court Decision 2003Gadan961, Busan District Court Decision 2003Da961)”, the Plaintiff’s indication of the claim against the Defendant C, and D (an inheritance share of 1/6).

2. Applicable provisions;

(a) Defendant A, B, and E: Article 208(3)3, and Articles 194 through 196 of the Civil Procedure Act;

(b) Defendant C, D: Article 208 (3) 2, and Article 150 (3) of the same Act;

arrow