logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.07.19 2016가합53005
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 11, 2001, the Plaintiff obtained approval of the housing construction project plan from the head of Yangju-gun, received funding from the National Housing Fund, and decided to construct the G apartment 19 Dong-dong 883 households (hereinafter “instant apartment”), a public construction rental house, on the 37,952 square meters of land in Yangju-gun-gun and 21 lots. Around August 22, 2001, the Plaintiff made a public announcement of the recruitment of the instant apartment after obtaining approval of the public announcement of the recruitment of the apartment from the head of Yangju-gun-gun.

B. The Plaintiff concluded each of the following lease agreements (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) with the Defendants regarding each of the relevant apartment units listed in the separate sheet of real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant apartment units”) after the public announcement of the recruitment of the said apartment units:

The deposit amount of the first lease real estate contract for the lessee Nos. 1 A (won), H apartment at Yangju-si, 103 Dong 303, 300,000 2 B on January 18, 2002, H apartment at Yangju-si, 106 Dong 902 on November 26, 2001, 106 Dong 106 Dong 1702 on March 15, 2002, H apartment at Yangju-si, 106 Dong 1702 on March 15, 2002, H apartment at Yangju-si, 106 Dong 1802, 1802 on November 24, 2001, 5 Dong 203 Dong 103 Dong 10101 on May 10, 2005 Dong 203 Dong Dong 10301 on May 10, 2001

C. After September 6, 2006, 1/2 of five years, which is the mandatory rental period of the apartment of this case, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with respect to 867 households among the apartment of this case (excluding 16 households, including the pertinent leased real estate of this case) after obtaining approval for the conversion for sale in lots from the two main markets over 10 times from around that time to April 14, 2010.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff filed an application for commencing rehabilitation procedures with Seoul Central District Court 201 Ma136 and received a decision on November 8, 201. On or around December 7, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission for conversion to sale in lots with 16 households, including relevant leased real estate, with the above rehabilitation court, and filed the said application from the above rehabilitation court around that time.

arrow