logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.10 2014구합2441
경관녹지등 지정해제부작위 위법확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who, in accordance with the trust agreement with the Korea Exchange Bank on October 29, 2010, entrusted the Korea Exchange Bank with the sum of 2,164m2,164m2 and 10m2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

The instant land is designated as landscape green areas and urban planning facilities (road) among infrastructure by the former National Land Planning and Utilization Act (amended by Act No. 12974, Jan. 6, 2015; hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”), and detailed matters are as shown in the land list and the current status of urban planning facilities.

B. From August 18, 2011 to August 7, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for revocation of the designation of a landscape green belt and urban planning facility on the instant land on several occasions (hereinafter “instant application”).

C. Accordingly, from August 25, 2011 to August 11, 2014, the Defendant sent the following answers to the instant application to the Plaintiff respectively.

It is known that the land of this case as of August 25, 201 and December 13, 2011 is expected to be reflected in the area where the first-class district unit plan (in foreign administration) was formulated as of August 14, 2006 by the Gyeonggi-do notification No. 2006-258 of Gyeonggi-do on August 14, 2006 according to the cancellation of green belt.

On May 30, 2012, the response to the request, such as the cancellation of urban planning facilities (a green belt and city planning road) in response to May 30, 2012, shall be referred to the official text that has already been submitted, and it shall be known that there is no plan to modify the district unit planning in 2012 and no plan to modify the urban management plan in the area

On March 11, 2014, the following facts are known: urban planning facilities (road and landscape green belt) determined on the land owned by the plaintiff on the land owned by the plaintiff and the matters designated as natural green belt on the land owned by the plaintiff on the land owned by the plaintiff (road and landscape green belt) in the Gopo-si, Gopo-si, Gopo-si, Kimpo-si,

In the future, the plaintiff is required to reorganize the urban management plan.

arrow