Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2017, around 14:30 on September 21, 2017, the Defendant openly committed obscene acts, such as cutting down his/her bomer, cutting off his/her bomer, and scaming and shaking his/her sexual organ, etc., which were first seen before the elevator of the first floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. Written statements, the application of each Act or subordinate statute of investigation reporting;

1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act and Article 245 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed;

1. The crime of determining whether a person is subject to an order to register, disclose, or disclose personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is an offense provided for in Article 2(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and does not constitute a sex offense subject to the registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the same Act, and does not constitute a sex offense subject to an order to disclose or notify personal information under Articles 47 and 49 of the same Act, and thus does not constitute a duty to submit personal information

Considering the Defendant’s age, home environment, character and conduct, risk of recidivism, details and motive of the crime, seriousness of the crime, prevention of sex crimes expected by an employment restriction order, and the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant resulting therefrom, etc., the Defendant is not subject to an employment restriction order. As such, the Defendant is not subject to an employment restriction order against children, juveniles-related institutions, etc. and welfare facilities for the disabled.