logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.09.06 2017고단2844
특수절도등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for one year and six months, respectively.

Defendant 1 through 5 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on June 26, 2014, and was released on December 23, 2016 during the execution of the sentence in Daejeon Prison on parole on December 23, 2016 and the parole period expired on April 23, 2017.

Defendant

B, a Chinese Malaysia, entered the Republic of Korea on April 10, 2017.

In order to prevent damage because financial information has been leaked by misrepresenting a large number of unspecified victims in China while engaging in activities in China, the Defendants: (a) made the victims withdraw cash to the victim’s house; (b) made the victims take out the cash; (c) stolen it; or (d) deposited money at a higher credit rating, stamp tax, etc. to obtain the loan by misrepresenting the lending company; and (b) deposited the money in the domestic remittance of the crime organization of telephone financing fraud (the so-called “scam”), or domestic cash withdrawal; (d) Defendant A, under the direction of the aforementioned staff members of the financial fraud organization in Korea, managed the cash withdrawal measures, such as Defendant B and E (Presumption as the person of nationality at Malaysia) in order to take part in the crime scene; (c) received the check card under the name of another person; and (d) received 200,000 won in order to take part in the withdrawn cash; and (e) received the cash withdrawal from the Defendant under the name of another person, and (e) received the cash withdrawal from the Defendant B in order.

1. On April 27, 2017, around 10:41, 201, an employee of the said telephone financing fraud assistance by committing the crime of “scaming” calls from the victim F, and thus, the entire amount of the deposit should be seized unless the deposit is withdrawn because a police officer is a police officer of the Suwon Police Station, who is a police officer of the damaged person’s Saemaul Treasury account as a security for the amount deposited in the term deposit account of the damaged person’s Saemaul Treasury.

arrow