The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Around 8:25 on July 16, 2013, the summary of the facts charged was assaulted by the victim, who was placed in the office where the victim D(66 years of age) and management expenses due to the default of the management expenses, and caused the victim to face with the left hand of the victim.

Judgment

In consistent with this law from investigative agencies to this court, the Defendant asserts that, while driving in order to walk by telephone with the victim D, he was faced with the victim's body while faced with the victim's body. However, the Defendant argued that there was no assault against the victim.

In light of the following circumstances, D’s statement alone is difficult to believe the Defendant’s assault and assault intent, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

First, D consistently stated in the investigative agency and the court that the defendant was able to see his own will, and that he was able to look at his own left hand, where he was able to take the phone to go on the telephone due to the problem of management expenses, and that he was able to see that he was able to go on the phone to the left side, and that he was able to see that he was able to live on the back of his own left hand, where he was able to go on the back of the telephone in front of the left side, and that he was able to live on the back of his own left hand.

However, according to on-site photograph data at the time when this court legitimately adopted and investigated as evidence, the person who was used in the crime was close to the table of the front door of the telephone, so if D coming close to the upper door of the narrow office to walk the telephone, the face had already been toward the direction of the telephone, and the defendant was able to turn back the front door to the left.