beta
Text
Of the first judgment, the part on Defendant E and the second judgment shall be reversed.
Defendant
E. Fines 10,000.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence (a fine of seven million won is imposed on the Defendants; a fine of five million won is imposed on the first instance court; a fine of five million won is imposed on the Defendants; the second instance court is sentenced to the imprisonment of six months; a suspended sentence of two years on the imprisonment of six months; a social service, and confiscation) is too unreasonable
2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on Defendant E’s grounds for appeal.
First of all, this court decided to jointly examine each appeal case against Defendant E, and each of the offenses in the judgment of the first instance court and the second instance judgment against Defendant E in the relation of substantive concurrent crimes as stipulated in the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and shall be sentenced to a single sentence within the scope of a single sentence under Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act. In this regard, the part against Defendant E in the judgment of the first instance court and the second judgment cannot be maintained.
Next, in the first instance trial, the prosecutor applied for changes in the indictment of Article 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in Paragraph (1) below, and this court permitted the changes in the subject of the judgment, and therefore, the first instance judgment against Defendant E cannot be maintained as it is.
3. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as Defendant D’s confession of the instant crime and misunderstanding of his mistake, absence of the same criminal records, and the fact that economic circumstances are not good, Defendant D’s assertion of unfair sentencing regarding Defendant D’s assertion of unfair sentencing, when considering the legislative intent of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users for the purpose of protecting financial users and contributing to the stable economic life of the people, it is necessary to strictly punish the instant case. In addition, Defendant D’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, the means and method of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, and this.