A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 3, 2018, the Defendant, at around 23:30, 2018, assaulted the Defendant, who was drunk in front of the Dong-ro, Guro-gu, Guro-gu, Seoul, 94-ro, 4, Do-ro, 4, in front of the Dong-ro community service center, with a view to booming the Defendant, such as “the same strings as this subject of education,” and “springs” on the ground that he did not go to the patrol house, and assaulted the Defendant, who was under the influence of drinking in front of the Dong-ro, Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to boom the Defendant’s hand, such as booming the shoulder of the above D, booming the boom with his ero

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (in addition to the punishment of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 2006, the defendant has no criminal history sentenced to imprisonment and the degree of assault is relatively minor);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;