logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.02.03 2015고정210
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

On January 30, 2015, the Defendant came to proceed from the 82 provincial road to the e station in front of the e station located in the voice group D, Chungcheongbuk-gun on January 30, 2015.

At the same time, there was an intersection that does not have a signal signal, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to reduce the speed before entering the intersection and to prevent the accident in advance by looking at the other vehicles' attitudes in another direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle as it is while driving the vehicle as it was, but the Defendant got the left side of the dump truck drivened by the Defendant with the front part of the Gump truck driven driven by the victim F, which is driven by the victim F.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the Victim F by the dump trucks, such as salt dump and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time destroyed the dump trucks with the repair cost of KRW 8,820,650.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that the occurrence of a traffic accident report, each photograph, actual survey report, diagnosis certificate, quotation, and black video CD (the defendant asserts to the effect that the victim's negligence is greater in the occurrence of the accident).

Examining the circumstances, etc. revealed in each of the above evidence, it is deemed that the victim's negligence was partially recognized, but the defendant who was trying to make a right-hand access to the intersection was more likely to have failed to make a temporary suspension or to drive slowly.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of occupational and dental occupation) and the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow