1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. From around 1994, the Plaintiff leased a building located in Daegu-gu D from C and operated a multilateral bank with the trade name “E”.

B. However, around February 23, 2005, when the Plaintiff temporarily suspended the multi-family business from around 2004, C re-leased the said building to the Defendant.

C. In the above building, various equipment, such as air conditioners, coolants, and laundry, used by the Plaintiff for multi-lateral business, and the equipment of tea teas, etc. were kept as they were. However, without the Plaintiff’s consent, the Defendant used or disposed of the said equipment, fixtures, etc. owned by the Plaintiff at his own discretion.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 28,130,000, which is equivalent to the value of the above house fixtures, fixtures, etc., and compensation for delay.

2. In full view of each of the statements in the evidence No. 1-1 and No. 2 of the judgment, the fact that the Plaintiff operated multiples with the trade name of “E” by leasing the building located in Daegu-gu D from C around 1994, and that C leases the above building again to the Defendant around February 23, 2005 is recognized.

However, each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4 alone at the time when the plaintiff discontinued his/her business in 2004, it was not sufficient to recognize that the defendant used or disposed of the above house and equipment without the plaintiff's consent, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.