Defendant

A, B and E shall be sentenced to two years of imprisonment, one year and six months of imprisonment for Defendant C, three years of imprisonment for Defendant D, and Defendant F.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant D is a person who was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months at the Cheongju District Court on January 18, 2013 due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts (remediation of commercial sex acts, etc.) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju District Court on July 13, 2013.

[Defendant A, B, and C]

1. In light of the fact that Defendants B and C were actually a de facto violent group members, and they participated in the joint assault against the victims who were the victims who were the victims of the Chuncheon living strike, and were the victims who were the victims of the Chuncheon living strike, and were the victims of the said Chuncheon living strike, and participated in the collective assault against the victims under the direction of H, which was a de facto violent group. In light of the fact that Defendants B and C were the victims of the Chuncheon living strike, they were the victims of the Chuncheon life strike, and were the victims of the Chuncheon life strike, and were the victims of the collectively carrying the knife and the knife and the knife, which were the victims of the crime.

In addition, H et al., the so-called "Sacheon Disaster P, a de facto violent organization in the past, was comprised of assistants belonging to the so-called "Sacheon Disaster P," a de facto violent organization, together with I, J, K, H, etc., and the victims L (31 tax), M (32 tax), N,O, and P are the aforementioned "Sacheon Disaster P," and they are the researchers belonging to the above "Sacheon" organization.

On November 19, 2015, L used N and alcohol at “R main points” located in Q 2nd floor located in Q 3:00, Q. However, the victim talked to the effect that “I did not go to Seoul,” and “I did not go to Seoul,” at that place.

In that sense, J, the first executive of I, talked with K in this situation, and Ha had expressed a desire to call the victim L, and Ha had talked with each other, and did so at the said R's point of view.

On the other hand, the defendant A expressed his desire from H to I at the L point of view.

R Republic of Korea (hereinafter “R”) calls to the effect that “I am in the future,” and contact Defendant B and C to the front of the said R.m.