A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 30, 2004, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Incheon District Court, on January 23, 2009, a summary order of KRW 7 million as a fine for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (driving Vehicles) at the same court on January 23, 2009, and on February 4, 2009, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 70,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the same court on April 30, 209, and on November 28, 2014, the summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a fine for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Traffic Accidents was issued by the same court on November 28, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a mixed car.

1. Around November 12:15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) led to the progress of the Defendant at a speed of about 50 kilometers a speed of about 50 kilometers a speed of 50 kilometers a speed, depending on the two-lanes in the direction of the distance between the two-lanes in the direction of the U.S. 12:15 roads of the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

At the time, the above place was a day, where traffic was controlled by signal apparatus, and the road was connected to the road to enter the large apartment complex, and thus, the traffic volume was relatively high, so there was a relatively large, so the person operating the above place had a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by properly operating the steering gear and the brakes, by properly operating the steering gear and the brakes, and by operating it with good care before, after, after, after, after, after, after,

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this, was driving in the state of drinking, and was driven by the victim E (the age of 51) who was waiting for the driving signal at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle due to occupational negligence that did not properly take the front time, and was driven by the victim E (the age of 51) as the front time part of the said mixed car.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence.