A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 9, 2019, at around 03:12, the Defendant: (a) caused the injury to the victim, such as a catum dump, etc., by gathering the fat, which is a dangerous object on the table table; (b) by gathering the head of the victim’s head on one occasion, putting the victim’s head on about two weeks of treatment, while the Defendant was under the influence of the Defendant’s daily alcohol, D, a driver of the Defendant, was in a dispute with the victim, going beyond the victim E (24 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A photograph of damaged part, and a written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of internal investigation reports (on-site access status, etc.) and statutes governing CCTV images on-site;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation Punishment] 02. The basic area (one month to two years of imprisonment) of category 1 (Special Bodily Injury) (two years of imprisonment] (decision of sentence] is disadvantageous: The violence and danger of the instant crime committed by the other party using the main disease, which is a dangerous object, is heavy.

Defendant has been punished for violence-related crimes in the past.

The victims did not recover from damage properly.

The favorable circumstances: The Defendant recognized the instant crime, thereby not repeating the same mistake.

No defendant has been punished in excess of a fine in the past.

The degree of injury suffered by the victim is not heavy.