logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.08.19 2020고단2444
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Busan District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

1. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven a B wing-in truck with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.152% at around 18:29 on May 20, 202, while driving a Bwing-in truck with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.152%, and led D High School C in Busan East-gu to drive the front road of D High School C from E Burial.

Since there has been narrow scope of the road width that can run as a side-way road without a median line, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brakes while living in the front line and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in not operating the steering and steering gear properly and was found to have been under the influence of the Defendant’s driver’s left-hand side of the Victim Franchis Gysta taxi, which was proceeding on the back-hand side of the Defendant’s driving.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt ties, tensions, etc., which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the time and time set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant driven the B 1 ton truck with the 0.152% blood alcohol concentration at the 4km section from the front of the Busan Dong-gu to the front of the D High School located in the same Gu C from the 4km section.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol, once again drives a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above prohibition provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Written diagnosis of the F's legal statement prepared by the defendant, notification of the results of drinking driving control, photographic traffic accident report related to the traffic accident (the actual condition survey report);

1. Previouss before judgment: Criminal history records;

arrow