logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.07.23 2013고단2412
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the owner of H truck. On February 17, 2003, at around 21:59, the Defendant violated the restriction on operation by operating the said vehicle with a total weight of more than 40 tons, exceeding 44.22 tons at the Ulsan Metropolitan Area, in the front of the Ulsan Metropolitan Area, and with regard to his duties.

2. The judgment prosecutor, applying Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and wholly amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), shall institute a public action, and a fine of KRW 500,00 has become final and conclusive due to a summary order subject to review, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "where the agent, the agent, or any other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article," and Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if the agent, the agent, or any other employee of the corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article 201Hun-Ga38 of Oct. 28, 2010 and thus, the

arrow