1. The Defendant: (a) from February 7, 2018, with respect to the Plaintiff A, KRW 34,200,000, KRW 31,000 to the Plaintiff B, and each of the above amounts.

Facts of recognition

A seller: The seller: The seller’s contract location of the Defendant’s agricultural obligation: The total purchase price of 15,200,000 won for 34,200,000 won for 15,000 won for 3,420,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 4,000 won for 3,000 won for 3,000 won for 1,000 won for 10: the seller’s contract location for 10,000 won for 2,000 won for 4,44,000 won for 4,4,000 won for 4,4,000 won for 3,00 won for 1,000 won for 3,00 won for 30,000 won for 3,

(Refund of down payment at the time of occurrence). The price shall be 6,000 won per square.

Any balance shall be paid prior to the work.

All management of crops shall be responsible for farmers.

Sickly, the farmer is responsible for the disease.

On September 18, 2017, the Plaintiffs entered into a contract for the sale of agricultural products (hereinafter “instant contract for the sale of agricultural products”) with the Defendant (agent D) on the following terms and conditions, and received the down payment as stipulated in the contract from the Defendant.

Pursuant to the above contract, around November 8, 2017, the Defendant harvested the worship cultivated by Plaintiff B, and around November 15, 2017, and taken them out.

【In light of the fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same), and the fact that the court held the witness D's testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant entered into the agreement with the plaintiffs, and subsequently took out all cultivated trends of the plaintiffs, barring special circumstances, the defendant is liable to pay the remaining amount under the agreement.

In regard to this, the Defendant had a considerable number of the worship cultivated by the Plaintiff A, and the distribution trend cultivated by the Plaintiff B had no value of the goods due to the unsatisf and ppuri disease, and thereby, to use the unit price for kimchi with a low unit price in D through D, and engaged in white tons (weight calculation). The result of the settlement thereof shows that the Plaintiffs cultivated.