1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B is KRW 600,000 and 5% per annum from September 2, 2014 to June 10, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 30, 2014, the Plaintiff reported E (hereinafter “E”) to the National Examination Board operated by the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission as a suspected fact of violating the Act, such as the Forest Protection Act.

B. On July 4, 2014, Defendant B, who had served in the investigation station and the F Team at the time, started the investigation after receiving the said case reported by the Plaintiff.

around July 9, 2014, Defendant B had Defendant D, a director of E, attend and investigate.

In the process of the above investigation, Defendant B expressed to the effect that Defendant D want to contact the Plaintiff, and Defendant B notified Defendant D of the name and contact number (portable telephone number) of the reporter.

C. On July 9, 2014, Defendant D sent a letter to the effect that he/she would have contacted the Plaintiff, and then requested the Plaintiff to the effect that he/she would withdraw the report of a civil petition by making a phone call.

After receiving a telephone call from Defendant D, the Plaintiff filed a petition against Defendant B at the hearing room of the Pakistan Police Station. D.

On July 10, 2014, Defendant B sent two copies of letters to the effect that he was subject to disciplinary action and wanting to make telephone calls to the Plaintiff.

On July 11, 2014, Defendant B also sent a letter to the effect that he/she verified the suspicion by investigating E on July 11, 2014, and that he/she did not recognize the content of the public interest report and sent a letter to the effect that he/she was in good faith.

E. Around July 18, 2014, when the investigation of disciplinary action against Defendant B was being conducted, Defendant C, who had been working in the same police station as Defendant B, called with the Plaintiff and asked the Plaintiff to have the preference against Defendant B while communicating with the Plaintiff.

F. Defendant B was subject to disciplinary action by the personnel committee on August 12, 2014 due to the instant case.

[Based on recognition] Evidence Nos. 2 through 4 (including Serials), Eul 1, 2, and Eul 2.