logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.12.20 2013고정3455
집회및시위에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the construction business in the vicinity of the Dongam Station Spaneng-dong, Incheon, and B is a person who is engaged in the construction business.

D, from September 21, 2012 to September 21, 2012, D reported an outdoor assembly to the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong Police Station under the name of “Seoul Bupyeong-gu Masan Scenic and bus platform public relations day” from September 29, 2012 to September 21:00 of the same day. From September 29, 2012, D, an operator of the C organization, reported the outdoor assembly under the name of “Seoul Bupyeong-gu Man-gu Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man-dong Man

In such cases, no one shall interfere with a peaceful assembly or demonstration or disturb order by means of violence, threat or other means.

Nevertheless, at around 17:30 on September 29, 2012, B passed the place of the above assembly to get on the subway in the East Cancer, it is thought that the content of the virtual key for publicity installed by D, etc. is a content to criticize the former presidents of the Party E supported by D, etc., and C, etc., which read “a false string,” while walking the virtual key for public relations to D, etc. as “a false string.”

In addition, the Defendant added to the crime in B, and the name of the signatory kept at the above assembly place was mistaken for that the signature was kept on the signature, and the signature was forged, and the name was changed from the signature seal registry, and the name was sounded to be crossed off from the sign board to the sign board for public relations.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with B interfered with peaceful assembly by assault, threat, or other means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol on the accused and B;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of on-site photograph or receipt of report for outdoor assembly;

1. Article 22 (1) and (3) of the Act on the elective Assembly and Demonstration regarding the facts constituting an offense;

arrow