1. The defendant shall pay 30,800,050 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from November 11, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire argument in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff supplied the defendant's business operator with electric materials up to February 2, 2012 to C, and the remaining amount out of the price of the goods is recognized as the grounds for 30,800,050 (it is reasonable to see that the plaintiff is a party to a contract for the supply of goods in light of the fact that the transaction statement issued by D, other than the plaintiff, is indicated in the plaintiff's name. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant, the title holder of the above C, is obliged to pay the above price of the goods and the amount of the goods and the amount of the goods delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant from November 11, 2014 to the day of full payment.

Although the defendant asserts that he only lent his name to E, who is the husband, and did not participate in the C business, it is difficult to believe that the evidence No. 1, which the defendant seems to be merely the nominal owner or at least the plaintiff was aware of such fact, is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted.

Thus, the claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.