A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-do branch on May 24, 201, and a fine of KRW 6 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Western Branch of the Daegu District Court on November 16, 2012.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving Cone Star Co., Ltd.

1. Around 250:30 on May 25, 2013, the Defendant driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.097% without a driver’s license, from the day before a restaurant in the trade non-fluence in the two Dongs of Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu to the day before the two roads of the same city, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.097%.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures Not to be Taken after Accidents) (hereinafter referred to as the "Road Traffic Act") runs two-lanes from the IC on the north-gu Gyeong-gu Gyeongwon-dong, Daegu, by driving the said car at a temporary border such as the above paragraph (1) to the direction of the mountain intersection.

A lane has been changed into one lane.

When changing the lane, there was a duty of care to change the lane by operating direction direction, etc., giving prior notice of change of course, and taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the vehicle line as it is, and caused the damage to the victim's Da driving in the same direction, even in front of the right side of the E-Baa car in the same direction, and received the parts as even before the left side of the vehicle of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not stop and take necessary measures, even though the repair cost, such as the right door plate, etc., by the above occupational negligence, was damaged to the extent that 441,283 won was damaged by the victim’s car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Statement on the state of exploitation, the statement on the state of survey, and the report on the state of survey;

1. Images of sea-going vehicles, damaged vehicles, motion pictures and videos;

1. Written estimate;