All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The facts charged against Defendant A is the representative director of Defendant Incorporated Corporation B, a corporation established for the purpose of distributing, processing, selling, etc. agricultural products by using the remaining Young-gun C as its seat.

A. On October 10, 2012, Defendant A drafted a derivative work by arbitrarily reproducing and modifying the images of the art work Nos. 148841 and 273502, a copyright, at the office of the said agricultural company B, and without the consent or legitimate authority of the injured party, at the victim’s office.

Accordingly, the defendant infringed the victim's copyright.

B. The Defendant Company B, a representative of the Defendant Company B, committed an offense against the Defendant’s business by the method as referred to in the above A, thereby infringing on the copyright of the said victim.

2. Determination

(a) Each offense subject to prosecution on complaint (Article 140 of the Copyright Act);

B. Revocation of the victim's complaint after the prosecution of this case was instituted

C. Dismissal of each public prosecution pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act