Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on August 9, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was completed on June 5, 2013 at the Ansan Prison.

【Criminal Facts】 2016 Highest 4981

1. On March 31, 2016, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residential intrusion) and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residential intrusion) owned by the victim E reconstruction association located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on March 31, 2016, and opened a 2nd floor office of container managed by the victim F who is the president of the above association. In order to enter the above office, Defendant B had the victim E-building association remove the entrance gate of the market price in the market price owned by the above association, and entered the above office through the entrance with Defendant A. In order to enter the above office again into the above office at around 09:00 on the same day, Defendant B connected the window of the above office with the escape of the above office and the locker, and caused Defendant B to open the window of the victim E-building association to open the window in the name without the market price of the victim E-building association, and Defendant A shouldered the market price through the above office.

Accordingly, the defendants jointly damaged the property of the victim E reconstruction association and infringed on the structure managed by the victim F.

2. On March 31, 2016, from around 08:00 to 14:00 of the same day, the Defendants, who interfered with the business, was at the E reconstruction association office located in the victim F, as described in paragraph (1) where the victim F was the head of the association, had intruded into the office as described in paragraph (2), and Defendant B was fright off the entrance, and Defendant A was able to prevent the victim from having access to the office for about six hours, such as cutting off the door on the stairs going to the office and setting up a sign sign that is prohibited from having access.

As such, the Defendants are the defendants.