beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of three years and six months, for a short of three years, for defendant B, for a maximum of two years and for a short of one year and six months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On May 10, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Seoul Western District Court on the part of May 10, 201 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 18, 2016.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On January 2016, Defendant A conspiredd to the effect that Defendant A was refusing to meet the Victim G (hereinafter referred to as “A”), which was known by the introduction of Defendant B, and Defendant B did not comply with the commitment that Defendant B would buy a boom, on the grounds that the victim G was aware of by the introduction of a bronon around September 2015. The Defendants conspired to the effect that “A would show time when he was towed by G” through H from March 7, 2016 to March 11, 2016.
Accordingly, at around 21:00 on March 11, 2016, Defendant A called the victim G by telephone with only one call at I Station, and then let high school-friendly job-friendly JJ (the same day to the Juvenile Department Department) set a car necessary for committing the crime, and the J sent the Defendants to I Station as the commitment place on the car so set as above.
Defendant A was aware that Defendant B and J continued to leave the said vehicle, and Defendant B and J had Defendant B and J leave the said vehicle, and had the victim G and the victim K (the 16-year-old age) who was the day of the operation of the vehicle under the presumption that they were aboard the mixed vehicle. However, Defendant B and J were unable to get off the vehicle by reporting that Defendant B and J are hiding in the surrounding area of the vehicle, and the victims were trying to get out of the vehicle, and Defendant A was unable to get out of the vehicle by leaving the victim G with his hand. Defendant B driven the said vehicle in shift with J. Defendant B. Defendant B operated the said vehicle in turn. Defendant B was knekking with the victim G’s arms, head, etc., and Defendant A was knekkneking with the victim G on the ground that it was refused. However, when Gbucks can be admitted due to traffic accident treatment due to the victim’s face, Defendant B and the victim K’s face can be considered as the victim’s hand.