The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too heavy;

2. However, the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant are the fact that the defendant has led to the crime of this case, and that the amount of defraudation is not large.

However, considering the fact that the defendant has been sentenced twice as the same crime, the fact that he did not make every effort to repay damage, such as replacing cell phones after the crime of this case and accompanying the victim, and that the damage has not been recovered even until now, and the scope of recommendation according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court is from June to June of imprisonment with prison labor, and the scope of recommendation according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court is from January to June of the same year (the decision of punishment] to the extent that there is no person who has been a special person [the scope of recommendation] less than KRW 100 million (the scope of punishment] [the scope of recommendation] from June to June of imprisonment with prison labor] to the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the argument of

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.