A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 9, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the imprisonment of six months for fraud at the Suwon Fagwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2016.

Defendant

(A) On March 29, 2013, as the representative director of the Dispute Resolution D Co., Ltd. (Change to E Co., Ltd. on December 26, 2012) to run the business of directly managing or arranging salesrooms in the expressway rest area (name A from March 29, 2013). A person is a person who has been engaged in business activities to use the remainder of the restricted fees for the purpose of “the expenses for the installation of the interior works, machinery, etc., and equipment of the relevant store,” etc. in return for a certain amount of money from founders who wish to run the store rest.

1. On August 21, 2012, the Defendant was running a highway rest store under the direct management of the Defendant, and opened a store in the franchise form, at the H Mart building (H Mart building) office located in Young-gu, Young-si, G around 201, the Defendant introduced the Defendant through the J of the I in charge of the LA in-house consulting company.

From November 20, 2012, in order to operate a "L" store at the entrance of a restaurant at which the Party from around November 20, 2012, it is responsible to enter into a contract with the F Rest and the store shop shop, and franchise company.

As a result, the consultation with the opposite party has already been reached, the amount of KRW 95 million has changed to that amount.If the contract is known, the down payment will be returned in full without the mold.

“Along on August 24, 2012, the Plaintiff received KRW 30 million,00,000,000,000 from the injured party, in total, as the down payment, from the service price of the above store establishment.

However, even if the Defendant received the above fees from the injured party, the Defendant tried to use all of the said money for the purpose of personal debt repayment against the Defendant’s “YY”, a provisional attachment creditor of the Plaintiff M&D.