(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.03.24 2015가단25157

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.03.24 2015가단25157

인테리어공사대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,086,00 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from July 23, 2015 to March 24, 2016.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

A. The Plaintiff is a construction business operator, and the Defendant is the person who requested the Plaintiff to conduct a marina shop under the trade name of the Cmamb site. The Plaintiff is a person who intends to commission the Plaintiff to conduct the shop (hereinafter “instant construction”).

B. On March 25, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for interior construction (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant for the Mar. 25, 2015. The total amount of the construction contract was KRW 5,000,000,000, and the construction period was from March 25, 2015 to April 24, 2015; the warranty period was one year from the completion date of the warranty period; and the delayed prize rate was 3/1,000 (0.3%) of the daily contract amount; and the same conditions at the time of failure to pay the construction cost respectively.

C. According to the instant contract, the Plaintiff completed the interior construction on May 5, 2015, and was paid by the Defendant totaling KRW 56,500,000 as construction cost (hereinafter “instant period construction cost”).

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of and the cause of claim for judgment as to Gap’s evidence, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the cause of claim for judgment pursuant to the contract of this case, following the execution of the construction of this case by the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff sought payment of money as stated in the claim of this case, including the cost of installation of the air conditioner KRW 7,796,00 (excluding KRW 3,00,000,000, including the cost of construction of the term payment of this case, among KRW 10,796,00,000), and the cost of additional construction, which was not paid in 21,610,000,000.

The related parts of the estimate of the scope of this project under the instant contract (see Evidence A No. 3 and No. 11 through No. 12) are as follows.

2. 2. The air conditioners (A/C) of each room.

4. 1) Installation of air conditioners and heating apparatus (20 square) type (e.g., omission).

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2017.04.27 2016나102748

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.08.16 2016고단3968

-부산지방법원 2018.07.05 2017고정2319

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.01.27 2020가단50857