logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고단3462
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, a holder of CT 100 Orna, was prohibited from operating a vehicle on the road without mandatory insurance. On April 26, 2015, the Defendant operated the said vehicle without mandatory insurance by driving the above Orna on April 15:24, 2015, and driving the said vehicle on the front of the Incheon Strengthening Group D, which was located in the border center of the State Council.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Inquiry into the enemy;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of non-life insurance);

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving CT 100 Oral Ba, and on April 26, 2015, at around 15:24, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the above Oral Ba and driving the D-do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Gun, Incheon, at a speed of about 30 km/h from the national village hall at the national village hall at the national village, and in such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in the Oral Do Do Do Do, had a duty of care to ensure that the Defendant, while driving the Or

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the victim E (W, 65 years of age) who was coming from the front side while driving without neglecting this, and received the victim's right side in front of the right side of the Defendant's Otoba.

The Defendant got injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during about 10 weeks of medical treatment, such as fluoral fluor, etc. from the right chain outside of the Republic of Korea, which requires medical treatment.

2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents clearly

arrow