1. The part concerning the claim for restoration among the lawsuits in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) the annexed list;

1. Indication of claim: delivery of a building following termination of a lease contract of the above real estate on the ground of a delay of rent by the defendant, overdue rent, and claim for damages equivalent to the monthly rent;

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. The purport of the claim in a part of dismissal ought to be specified in detail so that the content and scope of the claim can be clearly identified. The part for which the plaintiff seeks restoration to the defendant is not specified as the condition before the restoration of leased object of this case, the details of the alteration of structure, and the contents and scope of the restoration. Thus, the plaintiff's lawsuit on this part is unlawful.