A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates C in Ansan-si B.

No person shall employ any foreigner having no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, from December 26, 201 to May 14, 2013, the Defendant employed 17 foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible to work as shown in the attached Table of Crimes, including employment of D in China, from around December 26, 201 to around May 14, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each E, etc. statement;

1. Application of a certificate of employment of foreigners, a report on enforcement of immigration offenders, and a notice of decision on examining each immigration offender;

1. Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Articles 18(3) of the same Act, the choice of punishment for an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, and that the defendant has no criminal records exceeding the same criminal records and fines);