The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months.

. Prosecutors;

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The prosecutor (unfair sentencing on the defendants) sentenced by the court below to the defendants (unfair sentencing on the defendants: imprisonment of one year and four months, confiscation, defendant B: imprisonment of two years, suspended execution, four years, community service, 160 hours, confiscation) are deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below against Defendant A (unfair punishment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion on the assertion of unfair sentencing against Defendant A, together with the Defendant on the assertion of unfair sentencing, are the health care center; each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendant, by systematically and systematically collusion with the members of the fraud group who borrowed money from a bank through the guarantee of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, by abusing the fact that the loan of money from a deposit money for lease deposit is not strict in the process of examination and collection; the crime is not good; in the case of the above crimes, the matter of public funds from the Korea Housing Finance Corporation is resolved, which eventually causes substantial damage to ordinary people; the Defendant shared the role of mediating and lending the conclusion of false lease contracts and introducing the branches of banks; the role is not led, but appears to be essential for the instant crime; the participation of the Defendant in the instant crime was conducted 13 times in total; the amount obtained by the Defendant also exceeds 1.1 billion won; the Defendant committed the instant crime by being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on November 28, 2012, which was disadvantageous to the Defendant without becoming final and conclusive.

On the other hand, the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for the same crime, and the defendant extended security deposit with R of the employee of this case.